Hydromagnetic Stability of Al2O3-Water and CuO-Water Nanofluids: Effect on Critical Rayleigh Number

 

Jyoti Ahuja1, Urvashi Gupta2, R.K. Wanchoo2

1Energy Research Centre, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India

2Dr. S.S. Bhatnagar University Institute of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India

*Corresponding Author: dr_urvashi_gupta@yahoo.com, jyotiahuja1985@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

In the present paper, hydromagnetic stability of alumina-water and copper oxide-water nanofluids is investigated for top heavy configuration of nanoparticles. Brownian motion and thermophoretic forces are introduced due to the presence of nanoparticles and Lorentz force term is added in the momentum equation due to the presence of magnetic field. The problem has application in geophysics due to earth’s magnetic field and enhanced heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids.  Computations are carried out within the frame work of normal mode technique and single term Galerkin approximation. An eigen value equation representing the relation between various nanofluid parameters, magnetic field, growth rate of disturbance and wave number is obtained. It is observed that the thermal Rayleigh number increases with the increase in Chandrasekhar number and decreases with the increase in volume fraction of nanoparticles. Nanofluids with Al2O3 nanoparticles exhibit higher stability than the nanofluids containing CuO nanoparticles. The mode of instability is found to be through stationary convection. It is expected since for oscillatory motions to exist two of the buoyancy forces must act in the opposite directions.

 

KEY WORDS: Nanofluids; Brownian motion; Hydromagnetics; Critical Rayleigh number.

 

INTRODUCTION:

In nanofluids small sized particles (nanoparticles, 1-100nm) are suspended in base fluids using various techniques and this name was coined by Choi [1]. With the invention of nanofluids a keen interest in the development of energy efficient heat transfer equipments has been observed because of its high thermal conductivity. A comprehensive model for the enhanced thermal conductivity of the nanofluid has been given by Wang et al. [2]. The problem of thermal convection for regular fluids has been initiated by Chandrasekhar [3]. Afterwards, the problem of thermal convection for nanofluids based on Buongiorno’s model [4] caught the eyes of many scientists. Buongiorno’s model demonstrated the conservation equations of nanofluids in convective transport where the Brownian motion and thermophoretic forces of nanoparticles are introduced.  These conservation equations have been utilized by Tzou [5] to study the problem of thermal instability for nanofluids whereas in porous medium investigation has been carried out by Nield and Kuznetsov [6]. The growing volume of work on the area of thermal convection of nanofluids by considering different aspects of hydrodynamics and hydromagnetics is devoted by Bhadauria et al. [7] and Yadav et al. [8].  Recently, Gupta et al. [9] & Yadav et al. [10] considered thermal convection problem with magnetic field for bottom heavy and top heavy configuration of nanoparticles, respectively and used arbitrary nanofluid parameters.

 

Keeping in mind the importance of magnetic field in geophysics, astrophysics and heat transfer enhancement/reduction characteristics of nanofluids;  our interest is to bring out the effect of magnetic field on the thermal instability of a nanofluid layer. Our objective is to study top heavy configuration of nanoparticles by taking Al2O3-water and CuO-water nanofluids. The presence of magnetic field in fluid introduces Lorentz force term in addition to the body and buoyancy forces. In the present model normal mode technique and weighted residuals method has been employed to obtain the stability analysis. Magnetic field is found to delay the onset of convection and Al2O3 –water nanofluid is found to be more stable than CuO-water nanofluid. Further, it is found that oscillatory motions do not exist in the top heavy distribution of nanoparticles. Since for oscillatory motions to exist density gradient caused by a distribution of nanoparticles at the bottom must compete with the density variation caused by heating from the bottom.

 

1.      Mathematical Formulation of the Problem  

Equations (11) and (12) are integrated to find  and  for free-free boundary conditions and using the fact that the parametric value of  is large and that of is small. One gets the best approximated solution as

4.  Perturbation Equations and Normal Mode Analysis

Let us apply small disturbance to the system by heating it from the bottom. The imposition of disturbance on the initial solution is mathematically expressed as

5.  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

5.1 Oscillatory Convection

For oscillatory convection . Therefore, the state at which the instability sets as an oscillatory motions is determined by separating real and imaginary parts of the eigen value equation (22) after putting . Solution of the eigen value problem for which  is real gives the critical values of thermal Rayleigh number in case of overstability. But in the present case all the values of  are imaginary for the parametric values of Al2O3-water nanofluid and CuO-water nanofluid. Therefore, oscillatory motions do not exist for the system with distribution of nanoparticles at the upper layer of the fluid. This result is expected because for the existence of overstability two of the buoyancy forces must act in opposite directions.

5.2 Stationary Convection

For stationary convection. Therefore, eigen value Eq. (22) reduces to

It is noteworthy that the expression for thermal Rayleigh number is independent of both the Prandtl numbers.  Also, Brownian motion and thermophoretic forces produce their effect through conservation equation for nanoparticles. For ;reduces to the one given by Chandrasekhar [3] and for it agrees with the result of Nield and Kuznetsov [6]. For sufficiently large, the thermal Rayleigh number  takes negative value. This means the instability of top heavy arrangement is so high that the applied magnetic field must be increased or temperature at the lower boundary must be decreased in comparison to the upper boundary in order to attain neutral stability.

The critical values are obtained by putting . As a function of given by Eq. (25) attains its minimum when

Thus the critical wave number  shows a substantial rise with the rise in Chandrasekhar number Q and is independent of nanoparticles. For  the minimum is attained at and the corresponding critical Rayleigh number comes out to be 657.5 which is identical with the result of Chandrasekhar [3]. Further, it is noted that  is positive which means that with the increase in Chandrasekhar number thermal Rayleigh number increases. Further is negative which shows that the increase in nanoparticles for top heavy distribution destabilizes the system. According to Buongiorno [4] and Nield and Kuznetsov [6], the thermal characteristics values for alumina-water nanofluid and CuO-water nanofluid are:

 

We fix. Figures 2-3 depict the impact of magnetic field, on thermal Rayleigh number and critical Rayleigh number, respectively for Al2O3 –water and CuO –water nanofluids while Figs. 3-4 show the influence of volume fraction of nanoparticles on  and , respectively. These figures confirm the analytical results by showing that  as well as  increases with the rise in Chandrasekhar number whereas these values decrease with the rise in volume fraction of nanoparticles for both types of nanofluids. Thus, magnetic field shows a stabilizing character and its effect is to advance the onset of convection whereas volume fraction of nanoparticles shows a destabilizing character with the effect of quickening the onset of instability. The curves showing the effect of magnetic field and nanoparticles for Al2O3 –water nanofluid lie above the CuO-water nanofluid. Thus, Al2O3 –water nanofluid exhibit higher stability than CuO-water nanofluid in the presence of magnetic field. The mode of heat transfer is through stationary motions as overstability does not occur for the present configuration.

 

To differentiate our work from the previous works on nanofluids it is necessary to mention that Gupta et al. [9] & Yadav et al. [10] considered thermal convection problems with magnetic field for bottom heavy and top heavy configuration of nanoparticles, respectively, and used arbitrary nanofluid parameter values without taking the values for Al2O3-water & CuO-water nanofluids. In the present paper a comparative study of thermal instability in the presence of magnetic field has been done for these two nanofluids.

 

6. CONCLUSIONS:

Present paper investigates the effect of magnetic field on the Rayleigh-Bénard convection for top heavy configuration of nanoparticles for Al2O3–water and CuO-water nanofluids. Using normal mode technique and Galerkin single term approximation it has been found that the mode of heat transfer is through stationary motions. The Prandtl number and the magnetic Prandtl number do not contribute towards the thermal instability for stationary convection as the expression of thermal Rayleigh number for stationary convection is independent of both the numbers. Critical value of thermal Rayleigh number increases with the increase in magnetic field and decreases with the increase in volume fraction of nanoparticles for both types of fluids. Thus, Magnetic field delays the onset of convection to a large extent and volume fraction of nanoparticles quickens the onset of convection. Further, Al2O3–water nanofluid exhibit higher stability as compared to CuO-water nanofluid in the presence/absence of magnetic field.

 


Appendix A:  Nomenclature

    depth of the  fluid layer

  thermal diffusivity

  coefficient of Brownian diffusion

     growth rate         

  coefficient of thermophoretic diffusion

   number density

        acceleration due to gravity

time

                  perturbations in magnetic field

   pressure

                    vertical magnetic field

    temperature at upper wall

     thermal conductivity of fluid

    temperature at lower wall

     velocity of nanofluid

    charge on an electron

     volume fraction of nanoparticles

    frequency

    volume fraction at lower boundary

    wave number

    volume fraction at upper boundary

  density of base fluid            

   magnetic permeability

    fluid density

     resistivity

    viscosity of fluid

   heat capacity of  nanoparticles

  heat capacity of fluid

         fluid density at reference temperature

nanoparticle mass density

   volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion

    vorticity

,      wave numbers in -,- directions

    current density


 

7. REFERENCES:

1        S. Choi, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles: In D.A. Siginer, H.P. Wang (Eds.), Development and Applications of Non-Newtonian flows, ASME FED- 231/MD, 66 (1995), 99-105. 

2        W. Wang, L. Lin, Z. X. Feng, S. Y. Wang, A Comprehensive Model for the Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids, Journal of Advanced Research in Physics 3(2), (2012)  021209.

3        S. Chandrasekhar. Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic stability, New York, Dover Publications, (1981).

4        J. Buongiorno, Convective transport in nanofluids, ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, 128 (3) (2006), 240-250.

5        D. Y. Tzou, Thermal instability of nanofluids in natural convection, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51 (2008), 2967-2979.

6        D. A. Nield,  A. V. Kuznetsov, The onset of convection in a horizontal nanofluid layer of finite depth, European J. Mech,  B/Fluids, 29 (2010), 217-223.

7        B. S. Bhadauria, S. Agarwal, Natural convection in a nanofluid saturated rotating porous layer: A Nonlinear study, Transport in Porous Media, 87 (2) (2011), 585–602.

8        D. Yadav, G. S. Agrawal, R. Bhargava, Thermal instability of rotating nanofluid layer, International Journal of  Engineering Science, 49 (2011), 1171-1184.

9        U. Gupta, J. Ahuja, R. K. Wanchoo, Magneto convection in a nanofluid layer,  Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64 (2013), 1163-1171.

10      D. Yadav, R. Bhargava, G. S. Agrawal, Thermal instability in a nanofluid layer with vertical magnetic field, Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 80(1) (2012), 147-164.

 

 

Received on 28.12.2014                    Accepted on 10.01.2015

©A&V Publications all right reserved

Research J. Engineering and Tech. 6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2015 page 136-141

DOI: 10.5958/2321-581X.2015.00020.3